|
|
 |
|
One major descision Under the pressure of Monseuir Rachett or should I
say Signore Cassetti was refuse his case.
I made that descision because I only take cases that
intrest me. Also, I did not like his face (What an ugly face it was . To this very day I'm still not completely sure
he was human.) Though I am very happy with my descision .I would of saved a murderers life . Oh ! It gives me the chills!
Another reason I'm not sure he's human how could any normal man take part in such a cruel way of life .I didn't do it
because he looked evil and why would anyone want to help an evil looking(in this case evil too) person. Even ask Sherlock
Holmes, (for your information all you FREAKS who do not know who Sherlock Holmes is, he is on of of the greatest
detectives and fictional characters in the universe.) (It would help if he was alive OR real. but if he was he
would agree
Comments-
Lola says:In his position ,Knowing what he knew, I would
of helped the poor old man. (At least I thought he was a poor old man) I would do this because I would think ,
looks can be deceiving ,he is probably not evil. Besides, it would be nice to get the extra money, and its nice to help
people out Your descison make me give you more respect.It shows you can say no. I deeply respect people that can say
no.
|
|
|
Signore Casseti on The Orient Express I told you he's ugly, freaky,and evil looking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is all of us on The Orient Express
In the middle of this trip,
(All of part two.) I decided to question all of the passengers even the most unlikely of people like Princess
Dragomiroff and later on I decide to search the passenger's bags. I made this descicion because I felt I needed
to obtain information from these people ,hear their alibis, see who's lying, to see I should suspect more, and
to check for the evidence which can destroy someone's alibi. I didnt just eavesdrop beacause I'd like to know who is
lying and what they want say to my face so i could draw more conclusions this way.
Comments
Lola says: I would of went
for a little more Sherlock Holmes way. I would of eavesdropped ask questions in a disguise and interview them myself
I'd do it in a Sherlock Holmes way becuse I'd get the best of multiple worlds. I'd also get more facts. Then
I could tell if they are lying or not. Your descision again is not right or wrong, it just depends on opinion and style, and
that varies from person to person. If you just did one or the other you most likely would of came up with the wrong descision
or it would of took longer to solve. I actually gain respect for you. It shows you think of an efeective solution and follow
the descision through . That is a good quality in a person
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|